SMART
OBJECTIVES
By Chris J Thomas
Recent studies have shown that industrial supervisors
are working at less than 60 % of their potential. Basic management
skills training is guaranteed to change all this and at such little
cost
What are SMART objectives?
We always need to have objectives both in our private and business
life. However, to be effective these objectives need to have a chance
to succeed – they need to be SMART objectives.
To demonstrate the development of SMART objectives, I have invented
a list of possible objectives, which we are going to evaluate.
1. |
To increase output as much as possible |
2. |
To reduce accidents |
3. |
To increase output by 60% |
4. |
To improve performance by sacking anyone who shows a bad attitude |
5. |
To reduce accidents by 10% over the next 6 months |
6. |
To increase output by 1% over the next year |
7. |
To reduce costs by 50% over the next 6 months |
There are numerous methods to evaluate objectives. We need to identify
the real objectives and discard those that are merely statements. A
perfect objective is rare but it should perform well against the requirements
of the SMART test.
SMART OBJECTIVES
ARE . . |
S PECIFIC |
If an objective is precise then there is only
one way in which it can be interpreted. |
M EASURABLE |
In other words, can the success or otherwise of
achieving the objective be measured as we proceed?
This is not always easy to achieve as sometimes we have to
wait to the end to be able to measure. |
A CCEPTABLE |
This means acceptable to the organization, the
people that have to do it or society in general.
Of course, this would include illegal acts or anything that
is morally or ethically unacceptable. |
R EALISTIC |
In other words is it possible to do it. Of course,
you need to know the subject and the problems well to make this
judgment and this is why so many senior management objectives
fail.
It used to be thought that you should set objectives at slightly
higher levels than you actually require. The idea was that
people would extend themselves further. This is now considered
wrong because people do not try so hard if they think an objective
is not realistic. |
T IME RELATED |
When are you going to achieve it and when will
you start?
They say that road to heaven is paved with good intentions.
Without a time definition the objective lacks commitment. |
Let's look at our list of possible objectives and see what results
we can get with the SMART test.
RESULTS |
SPECIFIC |
Numbers 1, 2 and 4 fail (what is a bad attitude?). |
MEASURABLE |
5, 6 and 7 are measurable by comparing performance
against rate of progress required. 2 and 3 could be measured
at the end of specified periods.
1 and 4 fail in any practical sense. |
ACCEPTABLE |
6 might be acceptable to the work force but not
to the organization.
3 would not be acceptable to the unions or an industrial tribunal
7 would probably keep the accountants happy but not those who have to
do it. |
REALISTIC |
3 and 7 are almost certainly not realistic
5 and 6 may be - more information is required |
TIME |
5, 6 and 7 have times allocated. The rest no. |
Let's prepare a summary to identify
TEST |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
SPECIFIC |

|

|
OK |

|
OK |
OK |
OK |
MEASURABLE |

|
OK |
OK |

|
OK |
OK |
OK |
ACCEPTABLE |
OK |
OK |

|
OK |
OK |

|

|
REALISTIC |
OK |
OK |

|
OK |
OK |
OK |

|
TIME |

|

|

|
OK |
OK |
OK |
OK |
You will be amazed how effective this type of evaluation can be. Try
it yourself.
Chris Thomas is the author of the Managers Toolbox training material
located at www.managers-toolbox.com and runs the very successful Basic
Management Course for new leaders and supervisors. You can contact Chris@managers-toolbox.com